How CHAOS DECIDES
From signal to SKU: transparent and traceable.
Decision logic
Rules and models translate usage and organizational data into concrete license choices. Excluded alternatives are documented.
Why layer
Each decision contains justifications that are legible for finance and audit – no black box reporting.
Mock-Up
What-if scenarios show impact on cost and compliance before automation takes effect.
CHAOS — signals, rules, decision: traceable in one graph.
From the field
Scenario
IT wants to stop “gut-feel” licensing: usage signals, group memberships, and role profiles should converge into a clear SKU recommendation, including documented exclusions.
Why (evidence layer)
The rule engine and decision graph show which rule fired and which options were deliberately discarded. That transparency shortens billing and audit Q&A—fed automatically from tenant signals.
Before/after in EUR per month (run-rate). Annual savings = difference × 12. Figures reflect typical mid-market profiles consolidated from completed optimisation programmes (anonymised, rounded); your organisation will differ by inventory and governance.
Total before (monthly)
€ 128,000
Total after (monthly)
€ 99,840
Savings / year
€ 337,920
Savings
22%
Run-rate cost: before vs. after
License mix by SKU (after)
Split by Microsoft 365 / online SKUs (after — readable)
Microsoft 365 E3
€ 37,939 · 38.0%
Microsoft 365 F3
€ 21,965 · 22.0%
Microsoft 365 E5
€ 11,981 · 12.0%
Project Plan 3
€ 9,984 · 10.0%
Visio Plan 2
€ 7,987 · 8.0%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 (Plan 1)
€ 9,984 · 10.0%
Consolidated metrics from comparable customer programmes (anonymised under GDPR, rounded). This is how finance and IT teams usually read run-rate before a live tenant connect. Your authoritative view is built in the demo with your tenant.
| Total before (monthly) | 128000 |
|---|---|
| Total after (monthly) | 99840 |
| Savings / year | 337920 |